Canon EF600mm F4L IS mkII vs. the Canon EF800mm F5.6L IS

For many years my primary long lens for my wildlife photography was the Canon EF600mm F4L IS.  It served me well and overall was an excellent lens.  In 2010 I was able to borrow the new (at that time) Canon EF800mm F5.6L IS for the month long Images for Conservation Pro Tour  Contest in the Borderlands of Texas.  I quickly fell in love with it.  It was much lighter and faster focusing than my 600mm with even better image quality and I decided to acquire an 800mm as soon as possible.  I’ve been very happy with the 800mm over the last few years.   Canon then recently introduced an upgrade to the 600mm F4 IS with improved AF, image stabilization, optics, and they dramatically reduced the weight of the lens making it significantly lighter than my 800mm.  It ‘s getting rave reviews and I’ve seen some photographers state the new 600mm with a 1.4x converter is superior to the 800mm without a teleconveter.  I was somewhat skeptical of that observation.  On my recent “Winter Yellowstone” Photo tour one of my clients had the new Canon EF600mm F4L mkII with him and he graciously allowed me to try it out.


One morning during  the tour we found this moose, a good ways off the road, feeding on some willows.  I was able to compare my 800mm F5.6L IS without converter to the new 600mm mkII with a Canon 1.4x Mk III.  I used my Canon Eos 1D mk4 camera on each lens.  The image above was taken with the 800mm.  Below I will show 100% crops from the straight 800mm  and the 600mm + 1.4x converter giving similar focal lengths of 840mm vs. 800mm.   All images were taken @ F5.6


This image is the from the straight Canon EF800mm F5.6L IS, no teleconverter


This image is from the EF600mm F4 L IS mkII + EF1.4x mk III teleconverter = 840mm.

I took 4 shots which each lens to make sure I had a good sharp example of what each lens was capable of.  I focused in live view both manually and using contrast detection focusing, which is reputed to be very accurate.  In this quick and dirty test, under typical field conditions I encounter during my photography, the bare 800mm was somewhat better optically than the 600mm with the 1.4x teleconverter.  For my wildlife photography  in which I often photograph bears and wolves at a good distance, the 800m is a better choice.  I was impressed with the AF responsiveness  of the new 600mm with the 1.4x. I wouldn’t say the AF was better than the bare 800mm but it was much better than I recall having with the old 600mm and 1.4x converter.  At this point I think I will stay with my 800mm. I sure wouldn’t take any financial loss to make a switch.  Also  having the EF500mm F4L IS in my bag it makes more sense for me to keep both a 500mm and 800mm.  I will likely upgrade to the new 500mm lens which is even lighter and will really compliment my 800mm.


Sign up for our Nature Photography Newsletter

Posted , updated
Posted , updated

4 thoughts on “Canon EF600mm F4L IS mkII vs. the Canon EF800mm F5.6L IS”

  1. Thank you very much, for this great “quick and dirty” test.
    The 800 is my most often used lens. I’ve owned it since it became available and I really love this lens. I’ve tried out the 600 II also, but I find the enormous lens hood makes the 600 II less easy to handle in places where space is limited (cars, hides).
    I bought the new 500 to compliment my 800, terrific combination!

    Koen Frantzen

    1. Thank you Koen.. I know it’s not the most scientific test ever! The new 500mmm is so sweet. A couple of my shooting buddies have it and I think it’s superb! Love the light weight of the lens. Hope to replace my mk1 version 500mm soon.

  2. I own both the 800mm f5.6 and the new 600mm v2. Both got their strong and negative point. I found the same, without converter, the 800mm does perform better then the 600mm v2. With the 600mm v2 + 1.4 converter, I got very inconsistent result in sharpness, probably that’s due to the limitation of using converters. Once a while you can get very sharp images but most of the time, you could rather go without the converters.

    In my country, canon start dropping the price of 600v2 from us13k to now us11k. The 800mm remain at its high price of us15k.

    I was told the new 600mm was cheaper to make because it uses less optical lens to cut weight. Anyway, both are good lens and if budget is not a concern, I would strongly suggest 800mm f5.6!

    1. Thanks for the comments and it’s nice to have someone agree with my findings. I’ve seem some reviews say the opposite and I have a hard time believing that a lens with a 1.4x would be a better performer that a straight lens. It seems the 800mm has been forgotten or dismissed since the new 600mm came out. Used 800mm lenses are not selling even when priced in the $8500-9000 price range. To me a used 800mm at that price is the best value out there now for a super-tele.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *